In the third year doctoral students prepare a dissertation prospectus and present it at the prospectus conference, which is held yearly during the third week in January. The GSR does not serve on the Reading Committee. Although a variety of qualitative and quantitative methods may be appropriate, this section must provide a detailed and unambiguous description of the research methods to be used. The final prospectus must be formally approved by the committee within six months of completing the oral portion of the preliminary exam. This form must include the following key details: Title of Dissertation, an Abstract, Place and Time of Defense. The Chair acts as the primary point of contact with the candidate: meeting with the candidate on a regular basis; reading drafts of proposals and chapters and offering oral and written feedback in a timely manner; assessing the student’s performance throughout the process and alerting him or her (as well as other committee members and the DGS, as appropriate) about perceived weaknesses in the work; and serving as a primary source of information about the field of specialty, the job market, and possible career options post-degree.
Where human subjects are involved in the production of data, the student needs to identify the sources of risk to the subjects and the methods that will be used to ensure the participants are protected from harm and abrogation of basic rights. The dissertation prospectus is a brief document (10-15 pages) prepared by PhD students who have advanced to candidacy and are prepared to undertake their dissertation research. Identify the principal libraries and repositories as well as other locations and persons. Unanimous approval is required for passing the dissertation defense. Can the project be done. The resource requirements that should be identified at each stage of the dissertation include such items as the cooperation of outside agencies, research assistants, software and computer access beyond that routinely provided, consultation, and internal/external funding sought or received.
It should raise an important. Typically, the Chair will consult at this point with the committee members to determine which of the evaluation models (below) they prefer. If the committee disagrees, they will discuss evaluations to reach consensus. The dissertation is an original piece of scholarly research on a topic that has been jointly agreed upon by the student and Supervisory Committee members. For example, a student may illustrate in the prospectus, as well as in the dissertation or the oral defense, some or all of the following: a) working knowledge of social justice theories relevant to the paper topic and substantive area, b) reflective practices to understand self as scholar in the context of power dynamics, c) articulation of just methodology, d) understanding of social justice implications at each stage of the research process, and e) conceptualization and completion of research that has the potential to contribute to social work practice that advances social justice values.
At the end of this meeting, the student is told whether to proceed with the research or to modify the prospectus in light of committee objections. The oral defense lasts between two and three hours and allows the opportunity for each member of the committee to question the candidate about the dissertation. By December 2nd, the graduate coordinator will ask for three pieces of information as a prelude to the conference:. This form must include the following key details: Title of Dissertation, an Abstract, Place and Time of Defense. Rather, when you are presenting the research problem, related model and procedures, you must review literature that is related.
Prepare a table that specifies each stage of your work and the expected completion date. Once the time and place have been confirmed, the student must inform the Director of Doctoral Studies, who will announce the defense to the academic community at least two weeks prior to the scheduled defense. The prospectus is typically 10-15 double-spaced pages in length, not including bibliography. This is a question about sources, their nature, their accessibility, and how they will be used. Has this topic been treated before.
Also popular information:
- Who actually writes papers
Ones from Political Science are available in the Department’s library in the conference room. This subcommittee consists of at least three members of the Supervisory Committee (two of whom must be Social Welfare Faculty). Other disserations are also a good source of information. The entire committee must sign this form, and the Graduate Administrative Assistant will be forward it to the graduate school with the approved prospectus attached to it.
Fill in a gap in the existing scholarly literature. Upon completing the examination, the committee members will excuse the student while they confer. It is important to clear these things out initially to avoid confusion and pointless editing later on. The entire committee must sign this form, and the Graduate Administrative Assistant will be forward it to the graduate school with the approved prospectus attached to it. To avoid this, try to do what you would in any paper you write: make sure that your main argument remains clearly above ground, and that each paragraph has a clear connection with the ones preceding and following it.
The Chair acts as the primary point of contact with the candidate: meeting with the candidate on a regular basis; reading drafts of proposals and chapters and offering oral and written feedback in a timely manner; assessing the student’s performance throughout the process and alerting him or her (as well as other committee members and the DGS, as appropriate) about perceived weaknesses in the work; and serving as a primary source of information about the field of specialty, the job market, and possible career options post-degree. Whatever the methods used, key concepts are to be clearly articulated and defined in operational terms. After a successful defense, a student is expected to update his or her dissertation design as the project evolves. After the Chair has read and approved revisions to each individual chapter:. The candidate should bring the timeline to the meeting and is responsible for making any revisions thereto and redistributing it to the committee after the meeting. Chapter Outline reminds us that the dissertation will take on scholarship throughout as it builds an argument based on the evidence collected about graduate student tutor/teachers.
What is the significance of the project: does it break new ground. At least two weeks before the defense, a Final Oral Examination Schedule form must be completed by the Chair and sent to the Graduate School. After the prospectus is approved, the candidate should develop a realistic timeline for completing the entire dissertation. The University of North Carolina at Greensboro. What work has, and has not, been done in this field and on this problem.
If this deadline is not met, the Chair may recommend that the committee be dissolved and that he or she be replaced as director of the dissertation. Literature Review: Much of the prospectus should review the schoarly literature, whether divided into topical / thematic sections or as an ongoing discussion from theory to application, specific analyses to general reception, historical contexts to specific texts, or another organizational structure. The oral defense lasts between two and three hours and allows the opportunity for each member of the committee to question the candidate about the dissertation. , comparison of different methods of contracting for services). Dissertation Prospectus
The first step in planning the dissertation is to write a prospectus and obtain approval of it by the committee. After the Chair has read and approved revisions to each individual chapter:.
A minimum of 15 hours of ENG 799 is required for the degree; the maximum students can take is 24
At the end of this meeting, the student is told whether to proceed with the research or to modify the prospectus in light of committee objections. The PhD Assistant Director places one copy of the Dissertation Prospectus and evaluations in the student’s official file and one copy of the Prospectus in the PhD Program Office Public Dissertation Prospectus Binders. The exact methods chosen must be consistent with a clearly established epistemological perspective and must be of sufficient scope and rigor to clearly show strong potential for a significant advancement in the state of knowledge relevant to the research questions. To determine an accurate final submission date, the candidate should consult with the Director of Graduate Studies (DGS) to clarify deadlines during the semester for oral defense of the dissertation and final digital submission to the graduate school. Before actual work on the dissertation begins the candidate submits the cover page and three print copies of the approved prospectus along with copies of the Reading Committee evaluations to the PhD Program Assistant Director. The faculty neither encourages nor discourages such engagement, but cautions that original historical work should not simply illustrate other people’s ideas.